Describe the empirical and rationalistic arguments for the existence Essay

Describe the empirical and rationalistic arguments for the existence of God - Essay illustrationUsing this framework, rationalists argue that although no one can claims to have seen God, there is enough circumstantial evidence to prove his/her existence. For example, the beauty and splendor of the natural field with its own myriad of complexity and design suggests the existence of a benevolent creator. This is the argument some creationists employ to counter evolutionary biologists theories of random genetic mutations. The regularity of natural phenomena such as the rising of the Sun, the waxing and waning of the moon, the presence of other life-forms on earth, are all examples of the work of the omnipresent (yet unobservable) creator or God. Rationalists further argue that the tendency for higher animals to exhibit altruistic behaviour and unconditional love can be taken as more proof. At a broader level, the evil forces in the world need a countervailing positive force in the f orm of God. Empiricists, on the other hand, present complementary lines of thought. match to Empiricists, some of the transcendental experiences that occur to humans, whereby the realm of consciousness if elevated to another higher level is proof enough of Gods existence. Indeed, most such transcendental experiences coincide with a religious event such as prayer or godlike music, making the associations between the two quite strong. These divine experiences of Gods presence are not usually grasped through sense organs in the course of daily life, but require extra dedication to the faith and divinity for the revelation to occur.